why is it that i root for defensive teams? on some level, defense is a good sign of "effort" instead of a skill. Of course, all things being equal, i would objectively like to root for a team that is overachieving through effort instead of just being super talented.
but i'm starting to wonder if my obsession with defense is no different than CW's desire to see small ball. To get a Win, you need to score more points than your opponent. that's it.
I'm sitting here watching the pistons destroy the nets, and the announcers keep excusing kidd's horrible shooting with "well, he does so many other things to help them win. he doesn't need to score." Is this true? would we be as accepting as someone who was lights out shooting but couldn't play defense for his life? If not, why not?
Allan houston is terrible at defense. but i don't think it's a lack of effort in his case. He's just not athletic enough. But i hold it against him. I wrongly blame him for his lack of defense. It's a double standard, i know, but i can't stop.
This entry was posted
on Thursday, May 20, 2004
at Thursday, May 20, 2004
. You can follow any responses to this entry through the
comments feed
.
Archives
-
▼
2004
(128)
-
▼
May
(11)
- 2 amazing stats and 1 example of stupidity
- why do people keep checking this site?
- Warren Sapp is a big ol' meanie
- offense vs defense
- was i watching an ali g skit?
- Correlation does not equal causation: example #584
- Am I the last femminist left?
- dusty baker manages the expos?
- steve needs to edit this before i post it
- Local ordinance 404.1
- The thin fabric of society is eroding...
-
▼
May
(11)