i don't think for one second that artest's actions could be considered "self defense" from a legal standpoint. in theory, he probably broke the law. But i still don't think he should be prosecuted. (and yes, this will open a whole new can of worms since i tend to argue for full enforement of the law)
This entry was posted
on Saturday, November 20, 2004
at Saturday, November 20, 2004
. You can follow any responses to this entry through the
comments feed
.