no, he was worse.

Recently re-including tuna in the political emails, i wondered "Was tuna really that bad, or has time distorted my perception." Then i was washed over by memories of the idiotic things he would say.

One of my favorites was our debate over whether people buy stuff as a status symbol. I specifically remember pointing to a girl all the way down in the first row who had a coach bag. He swore that the reason that coach can sell for such a high price was b/c it was a quality item. By his logic, the bag would have to be about 500x as good as a normal bag, considering the price difference.

The best thing about the argument was that the bag was ugly. It just had that stupid C logo over and over and over again. or maybe i'm thinking of guchie and there were tons of G's. whatever, the point is that it proved that it was a status symbol. Nobody would be a brand named product if the logo wasn't visible.

Oh, now i remember the argument. there is a choice between two items: product A was of higher quality, but had no label. product b was slightly inferior, but had a logo on it that was known for being good. The buyer would know the exact level of quality of each item. He refused to accept that most people would buy prdouct B. Oh, i'm upset all over again. Maybe i need to retake Tuna off the list.

ABC is liberal! haha!!!